Since i'm not able to get any reply from FB, NC and IM i'll submite that here for the second time cause i got no real answer.

Hello,

If my block is related to the editing of my photos, I'd like to raise an essential point: a very large proportion of the images published on the platform are also retouched. Hair reworked, shadows added, lighting corrected, elements integrated via Photoshop... all of this is far removed from the actual rendering in Second Life.

For blog photos, content moderation should be the responsibility of the stores concerned, not the platform.

I blog about clothes, not hair. I'm not a hair blogger. Yet, I'm criticized for editing my hair, while many other people do the same without ever being questioned.

If these modifications are "not SL content," then this rule should apply to all users, without exception. Editing the hair or lighting in a photo is already tantamount to altering the reality of SL, and yet this type of content remains widely accepted.

I therefore don't understand why some creators are blocked while others can freely publish with visible edits. This unequal treatment calls into question the consistency and credibility of the moderation system.

If we prohibit all editing, then all modified photos should be affected. Otherwise, it's preferential treatment, and it's neither fair nor equitable.

Do I really have to stop retouching my hair in my photos? If it's a rule, it must be clearly formulated and applied to everyone.

Otherwise, we risk falling into a pattern of surveillance and denunciation, which has nothing to do with the creative spirit of the community.

I therefore ask you:

To reconsider this decision so that I can continue to publish my photos in the gallery.

To ensure impartial application of the rules for all users.

To officially clarify the accepted limits regarding image retouching.

If the gallery is to represent only pure SL content, then all photos should be raw, without any editing or post-processing. And in this case, the moderators themselves should apply this requirement universally.

Thank you in advance for your attention and for your clear and transparent response on this matter.

member badge

Teal Aurelia

marked this post as

fermé

Hi lLipsya,

Edited Second Life images are absolutely allowed in the public gallery. If you believe your photos have been incorrectly moderated, please DM Luke Rowley inworld and he'll be happy to help. I'm closing this thread, as editing is already acceptable.

If you're asking for AI enhancement to be allowed in the gallery, please make a new feature request specifically about AI. A vote was held some months ago where the vast majority were against AI (see: https://prmfd.co/p/aiIyXx0VVtVt ) but I'm certain the topic could be revisited if there is enough public interest.

I hope this helps.

·

5 days ago

·

Show Translation

·

Reply

lLipsya Resident

lLipsya Resident

Teal Aurelia Luke already replied to me but he didn't reply to my other messages at all (i been waiting for more than 2 weeks, i sent NC, IM, and FB). sorry but you guys blocked my account twice, saying that I use AI and then you put as a reason, "NO SL CONTENT" sorry but as I was saying, people who edit their photos and redo everything on the hair etc, it does not correspond to the hair of Second life. It is not correct or fair in fact, you close my post without even understanding it, you allow people to edit their photos and that does not correspond to SL but when it is me you accuse me wrongly without answering me, sorry but it is really disgusting.